Compare Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Chevrolet Evanda vs Chevrolet Malibu 8
Variants
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
490 kg / 1080 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Spring Strut
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/65 R16
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1440 mm / 56.7 in
1462 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1422.0 kg / 3135.0 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2738 mm / 107.8 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
131.0 hp / 97.7 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
65.6 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
181 Nm / 133.5 lb-ft @ 4200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
11%
41%
Pros
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- High cargo capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Limited by MacPherson strut front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.