Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Hyundai i30 III Fastback facelift vs Hyundai Sonata 8
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 345 mm
Vented 12"
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 314 mm
solid 11.2"
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4455 mm / 175.4 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
27%
37%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.