HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Mazda 3 BM Sedan vs Mazda 6 GJ Sedan

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
2.0 145hp
2.0 165hp
2.0 165hp AT
2.2D 150hp
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 175hp
2.2D 175hp AT
2.5 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
489 L / 17.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4580 mm / 180.3 in
4865 mm / 191.5 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1840 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.26

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
35%
28%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Very elegant exterior design
  • Reliability improved
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • No powerful engine options
  • Suspension downgraded to MacPherson struts

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.