HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Hyundai i30 III Fastback facelift vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.4 DCT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 314 mm
Drum
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Torsion bar
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4455 mm / 175.4 in
4569 mm / 179.9 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
15 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
27%
16%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Improved drivetrain range
  • Better styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Budget suspension setup
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.