Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Skoda Rapid vs Skoda Superb B5

Skoda | Cars

Variants

1.0 TSI

1.0 TSI DSG

1.5 TGI

1.5 TGI DSG

1.5 TSI

1.5 TSI DSG

2.0 TDI 116

2.0 TDI 116 DSG

2.0 TDI 150

2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG

2.0 TDI 150 DSG

2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG

2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG

1.4 TSI PHEV

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 MPI 75

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 85

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.6 MPI 110

1.6 MPI 110 AT

1.6 MPI 90

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 105

1.8T

1.9 TDI 101PS

1.9 TDI 131PS

2.0

2.0 TDI 140PS

2.5

2.5 AT

2.5 TDI

2.5 TDI AT

2.8

2.8 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

14.3 deg

14.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

12.8 deg

12.3 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Multi-link

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

4-door Sedan

Platform

Volkswagen B5

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

143 mm / 5.6 in

136 mm / 5.4 in

Size | Height

1461 mm / 57.5 in

Size | Length

4483 mm / 176.5 in

4803 mm / 189.1 in

Size | Width

1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1515.0 mm / 59.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1515.0 mm / 59.6 in

Wheelbase

2602 mm / 102.4 in

2803 mm / 110.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission

169 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 4

Engine | Redline

6000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score

37%

13%

29%

Pros

Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
Small turning circle
Some towing capacity

Low official fuel consumption

A cheaper way to get a B5.5 Passat
Lesser rear suspensions than the B5 Audi

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No fully independent suspensions

Front-end a little ugly
Too closely associated with taxi

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.