HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Mazda 3 BM Sedan vs Mazda 3 IV Sedan

Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.5 118 AT
1.8D 116
1.8D 116 AT
2.0 122
2.0 122 AT
2.0 162 AT
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181
2.0 SkyActiv-X 181 AT
2.5 186 AT
2.5 186 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.3 L / 6.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Torsion
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
155 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1440 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4580 mm / 180.3 in
4660 mm / 183.5 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.26
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
35%
48%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Interesting Skyactiv-X engine
  • Improved styling
  • Good engine reliability
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.