Compare Skoda Octavia 4 vs Hyundai Sonata 8 vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 136hp
2.0 136hp AT
2.0 147hp
2.0 147hp AT
2.4 150hp
2.4 150hp AT
2.5 160hp
2.5 175hp
2.5 175hp AT
2.5 GLS 160hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Vented 12"
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
solid 11.2"
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
36.1 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1410 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4900 mm / 192.9 in
4710 mm / 185.4 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1859 mm / 73.2 in
1818 mm / 71.6 in
Track Width | Front
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 2
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
37%
28%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
- Rather good styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.