Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Toyota Avensis 3 vs Toyota Corolla 7
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.2D
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 177hp
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1435 mm
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
4640 mm
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1780 mm
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)
Production
Availability
2020
2009 ~ 2011
Debut
2018
Made In
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
19%
32%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Somewhat improved styling
- Very reliable engines
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Use of CVT for petrol
- Only FWD
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Not as good-looking as the hatchback
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.