Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
42%
31%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
- Poor performance
- Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.