Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift vs Toyota Avalon 5 (XX50)

Volvo S90 facelift

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Toyota Avalon 5 (XX50)

Volvo S90 faceliftSkoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) faceliftToyota Avalon 5 (XX50)
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
2.5 Hybrid
3.5

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%42%46%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Handsome styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior space
  • Exceptional reliability
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.