Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) vs Skoda Rapid (NH3)

Volvo S90 facelift

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)

Skoda Rapid (NH3)

Volvo S90 faceliftSkoda Octavia 4 (NX)Skoda Rapid (NH3)
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%37%13%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.