Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Toyota Camry 5 vs Toyota Avalon 5
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.4 152hp
2.4 152hp AT
2.4 157hp
2.4 157hp AT
3.0 186hp AT
3.0 192hp AT
3.0 210hp AT
3.3 225hp AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
137 mm / 5.4 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4976 mm / 195.9 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.28
0.27
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed or CVT
Transmission | Type
Automatic or hybrid (eCVT)
Production
Availability
2020
2018
Debut
2018 NAIAS
Made In
USA, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
42%
46%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Great long-term reliability
- Handsome styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior space
- Exceptional reliability
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.