Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
22%
37%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
- Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.