Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs BMW 5 Series G30 vs BMW 5 Series E60
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
520d
520d ED AT
520d Mild Hybrid
520d Mild Hybrid xDrive
520d AT
520d xDrive AT
520i AT
525d AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
530e PHEV
530e PHEV xDrive
530e iPerformance
530i AT
530i xDrive AT
540d xDrive AT
540i AT
540i xDrive AT
M550d
M550i 462hp
M550i 530hp
520d
520i
520i AT
523i
525 Xi
525d
525i M54
525i M54 AT
525i N52
525i N52 AT
530i
530 Xd
530 Xi
530d 218hp
530d 218hp AT
530d 231hp
530d 231hp AT
530i M54
530i M54 AT
530i N52 AT
535d
540i
540i AT
545i
545i AT
550i
550i AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
351.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4841 mm / 190.6 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1846 mm / 72.7 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2888 mm / 113.7 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
211 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
92%
66%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Up to 530hp of power and 760Nm of torque
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Superb choice of NA engines
- Decent reliability and DIY-ability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Generic exterior and interior design
- Too many electronics
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Larger and heavier than the E39
- Less elegant than the E39
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.