Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Chevrolet Malibu 8 vs Chevrolet Nubira
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.0D
2.0D AT
2.0T AT 2014
2.0T AT 2013
2.4 167 hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 182hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 196hp AT
2.5 197hp AT
1.4
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
1.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1225 L / 43.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
485 kg / 1069 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson
MacPherson Strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double wishbone
Tire Size
195/55 R15
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1462 mm / 57.6 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4865 mm / 191.5 in
4515 mm / 177.8 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1854 mm / 73.0 in
1725 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2738 mm / 107.8 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
2005 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
41%
13%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Certainly not conspicuous
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Rather poor fuel economy for the power output
- Questionable design
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.