Compare Volvo S90 facelift vs Hyundai Elantra 7 vs Hyundai Grandeur 3 XG facelift
Variants
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.6 Gamma
1.6 Gamma AT
1.6 GDI DCT
1.6 Turbo GDI
1.6 Turbo GDI DCT
2.0 MPI IVT
G1.6 Smartstream
G1.6 Smartstream CVT
G2.0 Smartstream
G2.0 Smartstream AT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT
2.5 AT
3.0 AT
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
402 L / 14.2 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
683 kg / 1506 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4875 mm / 191.9 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.6 L, 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2020
2020
2003 ~ 2005
Debut
2020-03
Made In
Korea
Reviews
Neofiliac score
64%
26%
18%
Pros
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Unusual double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved V6 engine range
Cons
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Styling somewhat off
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.