Compare Volvo S60 III vs Skoda Octavia 4 vs Toyota Corolla 7
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1435 mm
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4640 mm
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1780 mm
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)
Production
Debut
2018
Made In
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
37%
32%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Not as good-looking as the hatchback
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.