Compare Volvo S60 III vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Toyota Corolla 7

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.5
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.8
1.8 CVT
1.8 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
11.6 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1435 mm
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
4640 mm
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1780 mm
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.2 - 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
I3 or I4 petrol w/ or w/o hybrid
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual, CVT, hybrid (eCVT)

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2018
Made In
Japan, China, Thailand, Taiwan, Turkey, USA, UK

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
64%
32%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.4L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Not as good-looking as the hatchback

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.