Compare Volvo S60 III vs Hyundai i30 III Fastback facelift vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.4 DCT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Torsion bar
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4455 mm / 175.4 in
4569 mm / 179.9 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
8.0J x 19
15 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2019
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
27%
16%
Pros
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Improved drivetrain range
- Better styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Budget suspension setup
- No independent rear suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.