Compare Volvo S60 III vs Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Volvo S60 III

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

Volvo S60 IIIMazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)
Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score61%35%32%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.