Compare Volvo S60 III vs Hyundai Elantra 7 vs Hyundai i30 III Fastback facelift

Variants
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 Gamma
1.6 Gamma AT
1.6 GDI DCT
1.6 Turbo GDI
1.6 Turbo GDI DCT
2.0 MPI IVT
G1.6 Smartstream
G1.6 Smartstream CVT
G2.0 Smartstream
G2.0 Smartstream AT
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
402 L / 14.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4455 mm / 175.4 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
1.6 L, 2.0 L
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2020-03
Made In
Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
26%
27%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Lack smoothness
  • Unreliable engines
  • Too many electronic gimmicks
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.