Compare Porsche Panamera 971 facelift vs BMW 6 Series G32 LCI vs BMW 5 Series G30 LCI

Variants
Panamera
Panamera 4 E-Hybrid
Panamera 4 Executive
Panamera 4 Executive E-Hybrid
Panamera 4S
Panamera 4S E-Hybrid
Panamera 4S Executive
Panamera 4S Executive E-Hybrid
Panamera GTS
Panamera Turbo S
Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid
Panamera Turbo S Executive
Panamera Turbo S Executive E-Hybrid
620d
630d
630d xDrive
630i
640d xDrive
640i
640i xDrive
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1800 L / 63.6 cu-ft
Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross)
0.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Length
5091 mm / 200.4 in
Size | Width
1937 mm / 76.3 in | 2165 mm / 85.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1902 mm / 74.9 in
1868 mm / 73.5 in
Track Width | Front
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Wheelbase
3070 mm / 120.9 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2200 kg / 4850 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
EURO 6d
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic PDK
Automatic Steptronic
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2020
2020
Debut
2016-10-12
Facelift
2020-05-27
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, Malaysia
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand

Reviews

Neofiliac score
93%
39%
83%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Great suspension setup
  • Superb handling
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Decent creature comfort
  • Decent performance
  • Improved base engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • AWD forced on the more interesting models
  • Hybrid nonsense
  • Extremely ugly
  • Ridiculous amount of electronics
  • Made not to last
  • Too many electronics
  • Stupid emission control systems

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.