Compare Jaguar XE X760 vs Jaguar XJ X358 vs Lexus LS 400 XF21

Variants
20d
20d AWD
20d MT
20t
25d AWD
25t
25t 2017
25t AWD
30t
30t AWD
35t
D180
D180 AWD
D200
D200 AWD
E-Performance
E-Performance MT
P250
P250 AWD
P250 Euro6d
P250 Euro6d AWD
P300
P300 AWD
P300 Euro6d AWD
SV Project 8
XE S
XJ TDVi
XJ TDVi L
XJ6
XJ8 3.5
XJ8 4.2 L
XJ8 4.2
XJR
LS 400

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
463 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
265/35 R20, 305/30 R20
225/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4995 mm / 196.7 in
Size | Width
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2104 mm / 82.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1898 mm / 74.7 in (mirror folded)
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2835 mm / 111.6 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.27
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
1UZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 242.2 cu-in / 3969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
60%
83%
75%
Pros
  • Decent interior
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Improved exterior styling
  • Strong double-wishbone suspension setup
  • All aluminum unibody construction
  • Superb handling
  • Beautiful interiors
  • Elegant styling
  • Best-in-class build quality
  • Exceptionally-reliable powertrain
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • Reliability concerns
  • Still unresolved engine long-term reliability issues

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.