Compare Maserati Quattroporte 6 vs Alpina B5 G30 vs Alpina B7 F01

Variants
Quattroporte
Quattroporte 2016
Quattroporte Diesel
Quattroporte GTS
Quattroporte S
Quattroporte S 2017
Quattroporte S Q4
Quattroporte S Q4 2017
Quattroporte Trofeo
LCI
Pre-LCI
B7 Bi-Turbo
B7 Bi-Turbo AWD
B7 Bi-Turbo AWD LWB
B7 Bi-Turbo LWB

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.2 L / 15.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
426 kg / 939 lbs
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR21, 285/30 ZR21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1481 mm / 58.3 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
5262 mm / 207.2 in
Size | Width
1902 mm / 74.9 in
Track Width | Front
1634.0 mm / 64.3 in
1611.0 mm / 63.4 in
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1647.0 mm / 64.8 in
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
1628.0 mm / 64.1 in
Wheel Size
8.5J x 21, 10J x 21
Wheelbase
3171 mm / 124.8 in
2975 mm / 117.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
F154 AM
N63M50
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
Engine | Power
540.0 hp / 402.7 kW @ 5200-6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
122.9 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
730 Nm / 538.4 lb-ft @ 2800-5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Switch-Tronic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
82%
82%
84%
Pros
  • Good handling
  • Improved performance
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved interior quality
  • Great performance
  • Good comfort
  • Lots of technologies
  • Good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Arguably even better-looking than the F01
  • Great fit and finish
Cons
  • Uglier than before
  • No more NA engine
  • Only AWD
  • Some reliability concerns
  • Old 6HP transmission before facelift

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.