Compare DS 9 vs Saab 9-3 II vs Saab 9-5 II
Variants
225 PS
225 PS E-TENSE
250 PS E-TENSE
360 PS E-TENSE 4x4
1.8i
1.9 TiD 120PS
1.9 TiD 150PS
2.0t 150PS
2.0t 150PS AT
2.0t 175PS
2.0t 175PS AT
2.0T 210PS
2.0T 210PS AT
2.2 TiD
2.8T V6
2.8T V6 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft
425 L / 15.0 cu-ft
513 L / 18.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
455 kg / 1003 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
GM Epsilon II LWB
Dimensions
Size | Height
1466 mm / 57.7 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4934 mm / 194.3 in
4635 mm / 182.5 in
5009 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1762 mm / 69.4 in
2113 mm / 83.2 in
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1566.0 mm / 61.7 in
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2895 mm / 114.0 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
EP6FDT
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.2:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.5 cu-in / 1598.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
57%
24%
35%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption for lower tax
- Rather good interior
- Gorgeous exterior design
- Decently-powered engines
- Styling ahead of its time
- Good fit and finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good appointments inside
Cons
- Only available with a tiny engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
- Basic suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.