Compare Audi RS 4 B7 Cabriolet vs Audi A5 B9 Cabriolet facelift
Variants
35 TDI
35 TFSI
40 TDI
40 TDI MHEV quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 190 quattro
40 TFSI 204
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft ~ 315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.6 L / 10.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1391 mm / 54.8 in
1384 mm / 54.5 in
Size | Length
4573 mm / 180.0 in
4697 mm / 184.9 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Weight
1855.0 kg / 4089.6 lbs
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2764 mm / 108.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.6 sec
Fuel Economy
19.9 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 10.3 L/100km / 22.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
BNS
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.2 L / 254.0 cu-in / 4163.0 cc
Engine | Power
420.0 hp / 313.2 kW @ 7800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.9 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
430 Nm / 317.2 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
65%
Pros
- Good performance
- Much improved styling over the base A4
- Multi-link suspensions all around
- Manual transmission
- Top-down motoring made possible for company car users
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Cons
- Engine reliability concerns
- Average look
- Ugly
- FWD-based
- Nose-heavy
- No manual transmission
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.