Compare BMW Z3 M Roadster vs Audi TT FV/8S Roadster facelift vs Audi TT (8J) Roadster
Variants
S50
S54
40 TFSI DCT
45 TFSI MT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI DCT
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
1.8 TFSI DCT
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 Euro5 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.8 L / 11.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
280 kg / 617 lbs
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1355 mm / 53.3 in
1358 mm / 53.5 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
4191 mm / 165.0 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1422.0 mm / 56.0 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
17 in
8J x 17
Wheelbase
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
16.6 L/100km / 14.2 MPG (urban) | 7.9 L/100km / 29.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
66%
40%
71%
Pros
- Good engines
- Simple to work on
- No BS driving experience
- Decent engine robustness
- Decent engine reliability
- Manual widely available
- Interesting VR6 engine
- Decent handling
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)
- Somewhat ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not as cheap as it looks
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Average looks with the top up
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.