Compare BMW M6 E64 Convertible vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi R8 4S Spyder facelift
Variants
M6
M6 DCT
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
RWD
quattro
Performance RWD
Performance quattro
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
112 L / 4.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
255/40 R19, 285/35 R19
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1377 mm / 54.2 in
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1242 mm / 48.9 in
Size | Length
4871 mm / 191.8 in
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4429 mm / 174.4 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1940 mm / 76.4 in | 2037 mm / 80.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1645.0 mm / 64.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19, 9.5J x 19
9J x 18
8.5J x 19, 11J x 19
Wheelbase
2781 mm / 109.5 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.6 sec
CO2 Emission
366 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Fuel Economy
15.2 L/100km / 15.5 MPG (combined) | 22.8 L/100km / 10.3 MPG (urban) | 10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
S85B50
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.0:1
10.0:1
12.7:1
Engine | Displacement
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 4999.0 cc
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Power
507.0 hp / 378.1 kW @ 7750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
101.4 hp/L / 1.7 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
75.2 mm / 3.0 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
520 Nm / 383.5 lb-ft @ 6100 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V10 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic S tronic
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
85%
74%
89%
Pros
- Characterful S85 engine
- Great looks with the top down
- Good power delivery
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Newly available in RWD
- Sweet N/A V10
- Overall good looks
- High levels of comfort
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Horrible engine reliability
- Does not handle well
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Very little cargo space
- Why not buy the Lambo for not much more?
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.