Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SL R230 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SL R230 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz SL R230 faceliftMercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
SL 55 AMG
SL 65 AMG
SL 350
SL 500
SL 600
AMG S 63 4MATIC+
AMG S 65
S 560

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%90%94%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Superb V12 engine and the last chance to get SL55 AMG
  • Beautiful hardtop convertible
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Last chance to get V12 from Mercedes
  • Good interior design
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Less reliable V6 and V8 engines compared to the M112/M113 found in pre-facelift
  • 7G-Tronic is a downgrade
  • Downgrade in styling with uglier grilles
  • Hot-V M176/M177 less reliable than the M156/M157

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.