Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SLC R172 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SLC R172 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz SLC R172 faceliftMercedes-Benz SLK R172
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
AMG SLC 43 367
AMG SLC 43 390
SLC 180 MT
SLC 180
SLC 200 MT
SLC 200
SLC 250d
SLC 300
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 MT
SLK 200
SLK 250 MT
SLK 250 CDI MT
SLK 250 CDI
SLK 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%73%81%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
  • Last opportunity to get naturally-aspirated V8 from Mercedes (M152)
  • SLK 350 got ride of the engine defect of its predecessor
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Downsized engine lineup
  • Ridiculous emission requirements
  • Stuffed full of electronics
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.