Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205 vs Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205

Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205Mercedes-Benz SLK R172
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 220d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 250
C 250d
C 300
C 400 4MATIC
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 MT
SLK 200
SLK 250 MT
SLK 250 CDI MT
SLK 250 CDI
SLK 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%80%81%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Possible to get C63 AMG / C63 S AMG
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Last opportunity to get naturally-aspirated V8 from Mercedes (M152)
  • SLK 350 got ride of the engine defect of its predecessor
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • AWD nonsense in many drivetrains
  • Diesel nonsense
  • Some quality concerns
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.