Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class A207 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz E-Class A207 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 faceliftMercedes-Benz E-Class A207 faceliftMercedes-Benz SLK R172
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273
E 200
E 200 MT
E 220 BlueTEC
E 220 BlueTEC MT
E 220 CDI
E 220 CDI MT
E 220d
E 220d MT
E 250
E 250 BlueTEC
E 250 BlueTEC MT
E 250 CDI
E 250 CDI MT
E 250d
E 250d MT
E 300
E 320
E 350
E 350 BlueTEC 7AT
E 350 BlueTEC 9AT
E 350d
E 400
E 500
E 500 Euro6
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 MT
SLK 200
SLK 250 MT
SLK 250 CDI MT
SLK 250 CDI
SLK 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score71%73%81%
Pros
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • New 9G-Tronic automatic transmission
  • Improved build quality
  • Last opportunity to get naturally-aspirated V8 from Mercedes (M152)
  • SLK 350 got ride of the engine defect of its predecessor
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns
  • Lingering electronics problems
  • No AMG model
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.