Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205 vs Mercedes-Benz SLK R171 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209

Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205

Mercedes-Benz SLK R171 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209Mercedes-Benz C-Class Cabriolet A205Mercedes-Benz SLK R171 facelift
Variants
CLK 55 AMG
CLK 200 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor MT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 240 MT
CLK 240
CLK 320
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 MT
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 220d MT
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 250
C 250d
C 300
C 400 4MATIC
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 Kompressor MT
SLK 200 Kompressor
SLK 280 MT
SLK 280
SLK 300 MT
SLK 300
SLK 350 MT
SLK 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score67%80%74%
Pros
  • Overall good drivetrain reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Possible to get C63 AMG / C63 S AMG
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Last chance to get the M113-powered SLK 55 AMG
  • Updated electronics
  • Perhaps improved engine reliability
Cons
  • Some quality issues
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Handling not that great
  • AWD nonsense in many drivetrains
  • Diesel nonsense
  • Some quality concerns
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.