Compare Mercedes SLR McLaren Roadster vs Chevrolet Corvette C7 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 Convertible
Variants
Roadster
Roadster 722 S
Grand Sport
Grand Sport AT
Stingray
Stingray AT
Z06
Z06 AT
ZR1
ZR1 AT
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
204 L / 7.2 cu-ft
206 L / 7.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.0 L / 11.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
97.0 L / 25.6 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
230 kg / 507 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 390 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
8.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1281 mm / 50.4 in
Size | Length
4656 mm / 183.3 in
Size | Width
1908 mm / 75.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1569.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1750.0 kg / 3858.1 lbs
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2811 mm / 110.7 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
348 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Fuel Economy
14.5 L/100km / 16.2 MPG (combined) | 20.9 L/100km / 11.3 MPG (urban) | 10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Euro 6 b
Engine
M 155.980
Engine | Bore
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
5.4 L / 331.9 cu-in / 5439.0 cc
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 SOHC engine with 3 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic AMG SPEEDSHIFT R
Reviews
Neofiliac score
89%
96%
80%
Pros
- Great performance and handling
- Overall good design
- Exceptionally stout drivetrain
- Superb performance
- Much improved handling
- Great chassis and suspension
- High drivetrain reliability
- Unique 7-speed manual transmission
- Decent performance
- Affordable way to get a big V8
- Sounds great
Cons
- Worse performance than the coupe
- Worse styling than the coupe
- Low cargo capacity
- The Targa may be more interesting
- Build quality concerns
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.