Compare Lamborghini Murcielago Roadster vs Mercedes SLS AMG Roadster vs Mercedes S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift
Variants
Murcielago LP 640 Roadster
Murcielago Roadster
Roadster
Final Edition GT Roadster
GT Roadster
AMG S 63 4MATIC+
AMG S 65
S 560
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
173 L / 6.1 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
14.0 L / 14.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.5 L / 10.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
310 kg / 683 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.2 ft
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1261 mm / 49.6 in
1417 mm / 55.8 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
1682.0 mm / 66.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
Weight
1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 8.5 J x 18 Rear wheel rims: 13 J x 18
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2945 mm / 115.9 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
495 g/km
308 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Fuel Economy
13.2 L/100km / 17.8 MPG (combined) | 19.9 L/100km / 11.8 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine
M 159.980
Engine | Bore
102.2 mm / 4.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.3:1
Engine | Displacement
6.2 L / 378.8 cu-in / 6208.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
94.6 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
650 Nm / 479.4 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
92%
94%
Pros
- Superb performance
- Great V12 sound
- Superb performance
- Gorgeous styling
- Great drivetrain reliability
- Good build quality
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Last chance to get V12 from Mercedes
- Good interior design
Cons
- Quite uncomfortable
- Reliability issues
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- No gull wing doors
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Downgrade in styling with uglier grilles
- Hot-V M176/M177 less reliable than the M156/M157
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.