Compare Chevrolet Corvette C5 Convertible vs Ford Mustang 6 Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 5 Convertible
Variants
ZR-1
ZR-1 AT
Z06
Z06 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 309
2.3 EcoBoost 309 AT
2.3 EcoBoost 317
2.3 EcoBoost 317 AT
3.7 304
3.7 304 AT
GT 421
GT 421 AT
GT 426
GT 426 AT
L99 AT
LS3
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
393 L / 13.9 cu-ft
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.6 L / 13.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/45 R18, 275/40 R18
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1394 mm / 54.9 in
1378 mm / 54.3 in
Size | Length
4837 mm / 190.4 in
Size | Width
1917 mm / 75.5 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2720 mm / 107.1 in
2852 mm / 112.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
LS1
Engine | Bore
99.0 mm / 3.9 in
103.2 mm / 4.1 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.1:1
Engine | Displacement
5.7 L / 345.7 cu-in / 5665.0 cc
6.2 L / 376.0 cu-in / 6162.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
78%
76%
Pros
- Iconic LS engine
- Solid drivetrain
- Double wishbone suspensions all around
- Sleek styling
- Improved styling
- Better build quality
- Fully independent suspensions
- Athletic design
- Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
- Improved drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Tiny inline-4 engine
- Low cargo capacity
- Low side and rear visibility
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.