Compare Ford Mustang 4 Convertible vs Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Chevrolet Camaro 4 Convertible
Variants
3.8 147
3.8 190
3.8 GT 152
4.6 Cobra R
4.6 Cobra
4.6 GT 215
4.6 GT 228
4.6 GT 263
5.0 GT
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
3.4
3.4 AT
3.8 193
3.8 203
3.8 203 AT
5.7 279
5.7 279 AT
5.7 344 AT
Z28
Z28 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Passengers
4
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Solid axle
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
89%
72%
Pros
- Good reliability record
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
- Good engine reliability
- Decent build quality
- Easy to work on
Cons
- Basic suspension setup
- Low cargo capacity
- Down on power
- Inefficient
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
- Dated styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.