Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Alpina B6 E64 vs Jaguar F-Type Convertible facelift

Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
B6
B6 S
P300
P450 AWD
P450
P575 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
233 L / 8.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
2
Payload
260 kg / 573 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1371 mm / 54.0 in
1307 mm / 51.5 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4470 mm / 176.0 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1923 mm / 75.7 in | 2042 mm / 80.4 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Weight
1930.0 kg / 4254.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2622 mm / 103.2 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
18.9 L/100km / 12.4 MPG (combined) | 22.6 L/100km / 10.4 MPG (urban) | 9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.0:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.4 cu-in / 4398.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
82.7 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Supercharged multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Quickshift

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
87%
87%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great styling
  • Great handling
  • Superb elegance and styling
  • Good performance
  • Decent handling
  • Good styling for its class
  • Good performance
  • Still RWD-based
  • Available in V8
Cons
  • Loss of elegance compared to the XK
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No more manual transmission
  • AWD nonsense
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.