Compare Jaguar F-Type Convertible vs Lexus SC 430 vs Jaguar XK X150 Convertible

Variants
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
5AT
6AT
XK
XK 4.2
XKR 4.2
XKR 5.0

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
135 L / 4.8 cu-ft ~ 450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
245/40 R18

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1349.0 mm / 53.1 in
1329 mm / 52.3 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheelbase
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.3 L / 262.0 cu-in / 4293.0 cc
Engine | Power
285.0 hp / 212.5 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.4 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
419 Nm / 309.0 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2001 ~ 2005

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
97%
92%
Pros
  • Good performance
  • Great styling
  • Great handling
  • Sensuous, elegant styling
  • Folding hard top
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Characterful V8
  • Easy to maintain and DIY
  • Superb elegance
  • Great, characterful engine
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Comfortable yet sporty
Cons
  • Loss of elegance compared to the XK
  • Small cargo capacity
  • Useless rear seats

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.