Compare Jaguar XK X150 Convertible facelift vs Mercedes AMG GT Roadster vs Jaguar F-Type Convertible
Variants
XK
XKR
XKR-S
GT
GT C
GT S
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
200 L / 7.1 cu-ft ~ 313 L / 11.1 cu-ft
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
7.2 L / 7.7 qt
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.6 L / 18.7 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
9.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
100 mm / 3.9 in
96 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Width
2028 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1892 mm / 74.5 in (mirror folded)
1939 mm / 76.3 in | 2075 mm / 81.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Rear
1651.0 mm / 65.0 in
Wheelbase
2752 mm / 108.3 in
2630 mm / 103.5 in
2622 mm / 103.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
AJ133
M 178 DE 40 AL
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 5000.0 cc
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Double clutch transmission (DCT)
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2014
2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
93%
91%
89%
Pros
- Superb supercharged engines
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Comfortable yet sporty
- Better-looking than the coupe
- Good performance overall
- Relatively tight and light
- Robust drivetrain
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
Cons
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Very little cargo space
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.