Compare Jaguar XK X100 Convertible vs Alpina Roadster V8 vs Jaguar F-Type Convertible
Variants
XK8 5AT
XK8 6AT
XKR 5AT
XKR 6AT
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
3.0 V6 (400 Hp) Automatic
5.0 AT
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
R AT
R AWD AT
R Euro6d AWD AT
S
S AT
S AWD AT
SVR AWD AT
SVR Euro6d AWD AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
Passengers
4
2
2
Payload
335 kg / 739 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
255/35 R20
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1306 mm / 51.4 in
1320 mm / 52.0 in
Size | Length
4760 mm / 187.4 in
4400 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Weight
1615.0 kg / 3560.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2622 mm / 103.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.0 sec
Fuel Economy
9.3 L/100km / 25.3 MPG (combined) | 15.0 L/100km / 15.7 MPG (urban) | 7.5 L/100km / 31.4 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
260.0 km/h / 161.6 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.8 L / 295.2 cu-in / 4837.0 cc
Engine | Power
381.0 hp / 284.1 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
78.8 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
520 Nm / 383.5 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Manual
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2006
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
83%
89%
Pros
- Great elegance
- Comfortable yet a little sporty
- Good engine reliability
- High interior quality
- Superb styling (but not better than the Z8)
- Good handling (but not better than the Z8)
- Good performance
- Great styling
- Great handling
Cons
- Horrendous ZF 5HP transmission
- A downgrade from the standard E52 Z8
- Loss of elegance compared to the XK
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.