Compare Volvo C70 II vs Volvo C70 Convertible
Variants
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
2.0T 180
2.0T 225
2.0T 225 AT
2.0T 163
T5 239
T5 245
2.4T 200
2.5
2.5 AT
2.5T
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
28%
Pros
- Good drivetrain reliability
- Cheap on the used market
- Characterful I5 engines
- No diesel nonsense
- Reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Diesel in a convertible
- Complicated top mechanism
- Ugly with the top up and down
- Low cargo capacity
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.