Compare Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe vs Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Skoda Fabia 3

Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203 Hatchback (2000-2008)

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 Hatchback (2004-2012)

Skoda Fabia 3 (NJ) Hatchback (2014-2021)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Variants

C 30 CDI AMG AT

C 32 AMG AT

C 160

C 160 AT

C 180

C 180 AT

C 180 Kompressor

C 180 Kompressor AT

C 200 CDI

C 200 CDI AT

C 200 CGI

C 200 Kompressor Euro4

C 200 Kompressor

C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 200 Kompressor AT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI AT

C 220 CDI Euro4

C 220 CDI Euro4 AT

C 230

C 230 AT

C 230 Kompressor Euro4

C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 230 Kompressor

C 230 Kompressor AT

C 320

C 320 AT

C 350

C 350 AT

A 150

A 150 CVT

A 160 CDI

A 160 CDI CVT

A 170

A 170 CVT

A 180 CDI

A 180 CDI CVT

A 200

A 200 CDI

A 200 CDI CVT

A 200 CVT

A 200 Turbo

A 200 Turbo CVT

1.0 60

1.0 75

1.0 60 2019+

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 2018+

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 110 DSG 2018+

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 2018+

1.0 TSI 95 DSG 2020+

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 110 DSG

1.2 TSI 90

1.4 TDI 105

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft

435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft

330 L / 11.7 cu-ft ~ 1150 L / 40.6 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

54.0 L / 14.3 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent

Semi-independent, Torsion

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.3 ft

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

3-door Coupe

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1467 mm / 57.8 in

Size | Length

4343 mm / 171.0 in

3838 mm / 151.1 in

Size | Width

1764 mm / 69.4 in

Wheelbase

2715 mm / 106.9 in

2568 mm / 101.1 in

2470 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

14%

Pros

RWD-based
Fully independent suspensions

Three-pointed star

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible AMGs

Poor engine options
No independent rear suspensions
CVT
Exceptionally ugly
Great insult to the Mercedes name

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.