Compare Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 Coupe vs Mercedes-AMG GT C190 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 Coupe

Mercedes-AMG GT C190 facelift

Mercedes-Benz S-Class C217 faceliftMercedes-Benz S-Class C217 CoupeMercedes-AMG GT C190 facelift
Variants
S 63 AMG 4MATIC+
S 65 AMG
S 450 4MATIC
S 560 4MATIC
S 560
S 63 AMG 4MATIC
S 63 AMG
S 65 AMG
S 400 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC
S 500
GT
GT Black Series
GT C
GT R
GT S

Reviews

Neofiliac score89%92%91%
Pros
  • Last chance to get the AMG V12
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • New 9G-Tronic automatic transmission
  • Updated M279 V12
  • Luxurious interior
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Rather good styling
  • S65 AMG remained RWD
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 730hp of power and 800Nm of torque
  • More focused than its predecessors
  • Good handling
  • RWD
Cons
  • S63 AMG in AWD only
  • Uglier than before
  • AWD nonsense
  • No S600 Coupe
  • Smaller than the C216
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Very tight inside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.