Compare Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C215 vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C215

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class C215Mercedes-Benz CLK C209Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift
Variants
CL 55 AMG
CL 63 AMG
CL 500
CL 600
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score85%72%79%
Pros
  • Exceptional styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Superb V8 engines
  • Solid 5G-Tronic automatic transmission
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
Cons
  • Horrendous ABC problems
  • Disastrous M137 V12 engine
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.