Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe vs Audi S5 (F5)

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift Coupe

Audi S5 (F5)

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 faceliftMercedes-Benz C-Class C205 facelift CoupeAudi S5 (F5)
Variants
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI

Reviews

Neofiliac score79%70%60%
Pros
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
  • Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Lots of power
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More balanced than Mk1
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • AWD nonsense
  • Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
  • Less durable engines
  • Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
  • Ugly, over-styled body
  • Questionable drivetrain reliability
  • Too much tech nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.