Compare Mercedes CLK C209 vs Mercedes C-Class Coupe C205 facelift vs Audi S5 F5
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63 S
AMG C 63
C 180 MT
C 180
C 200 4MATIC
C 200
C 200d
C 220d 4MATIC
C 220d
C 300e 4MATIC
C 300e
C 300d 4MATIC
C 300d
C 400 4MATIC
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.4 m / 37.6 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.27
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
70%
60%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent styling
- Robust engine lineup
- Interesting AMG V8 lived on for the last generation
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Lots of power
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- More balanced than Mk1
Cons
- CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- AWD nonsense
- Mild-hybrid voodoo nonsense
- Less durable engines
- Rather ugly as a coupe (hunchback styling of fake coupe?)
- Ugly, over-styled body
- Questionable drivetrain reliability
- Too much tech nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.