Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe vs Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe

Audi TT RS (8S)

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 CoupeAudi TT RS (8S)
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
C 180
C 180 AT
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT
C 200
C 200 AT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI AT
C 250 AT
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI AT
C 350 AT
C 63 AMG
C 63 AMG Black Series
C 63 AMG Edition 507
C 63 AMG Performance

Reviews

Neofiliac score72%75%69%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Rather robust drivetrain
  • Quick and fast
  • Less ugly rear wing
Cons
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Lower grade of build than the CLK
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No more manual transmission
  • Complicated emission control reduces reliability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.