Compare Mercedes CLK C209 vs Lotus Exige 2 vs Chrysler Crossfire

Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
Exige
Exige S
3.2 MT
3.2 AT
SRT-6

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft
115 L / 4.1 cu-ft
215 L / 7.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
4
2
2

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
195/50 R16, 225/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1296 mm / 51.0 in
Size | Length
4638 mm / 182.6 in
4058 mm / 159.8 in
Track Width | Front
1454.0 mm / 57.2 in
1493.0 mm / 58.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1502.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16, 8.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in
2400 mm / 94.5 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
208 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
8.8 L/100km / 26.7 MPG (combined) | 12.0 L/100km / 19.6 MPG (urban) | 6.8 L/100km / 34.6 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
2ZZ-GE
M112 E32
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.6 cu-in / 1796.0 cc
3.2 L / 195.2 cu-in / 3199.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Reviews

Neofiliac score
72%
78%
79%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • Improved engine output
  • Better transmission
  • Very light
  • Great handling
  • Iconic rear styling
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Double-wishbone + multi-linke suspension setup
  • Available with manual transmission
Cons
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Very little cargo space
  • Perhaps too compact

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.