Compare Mercedes-Benz CLS C218 vs Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290 vs BMW 3 Series G20

Mercedes-Benz CLS C218

Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290

BMW 3 Series G20

Mercedes-Benz CLS C218Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe X290BMW 3 Series G20
Variants
CLS 250 CDI
CLS 350
CLS 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
CLS 350 CDI
CLS 350 CDI 4MATIC
CLS 500
CLS 500 4MATIC
CLS 63 AMG
CLS 63 AMG 4MATIC
43 4MATIC+
53 4MATIC+
63 4MATIC+
63 S 4MATIC+
63 S E-Performance
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320i AT
320i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%77%68%
Pros
  • Good M278 engine
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Superb performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 639hp of power and tremendous 900Nm of torque
  • Decent handling
  • Decent styling
  • Closed-deck engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Markedly uglier than the C219 CLS
  • AWD nonsense
  • Small diesel nonsense
  • MacPherson strut front suspension
  • Horrible bastardization of a good sports car
  • Ridiculous hunchback sedan form factor
  • AWD only
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.